The program goals are to preserve Russia’s commitment to non-proliferation regimes for weapons of mass destruction and facilitate US-Russian dialogue. Activities help consolidate the non-proliferation community of officials and experts in Russia through regular meetings on nuclear materials control and protection, the multilateral exports control regime, ratification of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons agreements, and the merits of national missile defense. In Fall 2003, the program and the PIR Center organized the Second Moscow International Nonproliferation Conference.
Nuclear Disarmament and Nonproliferation: Problems and Prospects
What are the main challenges in the way of nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation? What role do international institutions, such as the UN Security Council and the IAEA, play in promoting a nuclear-free world? Can finding solutions to the problems of banning nuclear testing and establishing control over tactical nuclear weapons, precision weapons and fissile materials provide a positive impact on nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation? What are the prospects for U ...
Manmohan Singh’s Visit to Moscow – a Cause for Reflection on the Future of Russian-Indian Relations
“To the extent that Russian and Indian leaders exchange visits each year, Manmohan Singh's trip is somewhat routine. That said, though, these visits have not always led to the development of real agreements,” notes Carnegie Moscow Center expert Peter Topychkanov ...
The news emerged on September 25, 2009, that Iran has a second uranium enrichment site. Just a couple of days later, on September 27-28, Iran tested missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads ...
Jessica T. Mathews Delivers NGO Statement at CTBT Conference
Representing 40 non-government organizations at the UN conference on September 25, 2009, Jessica T. Mathews, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, urged key governments to ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty ...
Medvedev Supports Major Cuts in Strategic Offensive Weapons
“President Medvedev has expressed support for far-reaching cutbacks in strategic offensive weapons,” said Alexei Arbatov, member of the Carnegie Moscow Center's Expert Council, commenting on the president’s recent statement ...
Where does the nonproliferation path lead? How to escape the deadlocks? What role in the reinforcement of the nonproliferation regime does the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament play? These and other issues were discussed at a seminar held by the Carnegie Moscow Center on June 19, 2009 ...
In accordance with the decision made by the Russian and U.S. presidents to develop and approve a new strategic offensive arms reduction treaty by the end of the year, the first round of full-scale talks took place in Moscow on May 19-20, 2009 ...
Dmitry Medvedev Approves Russian National Security Strategy to 2020
On May 12, 2009, president Dmitry Medvedev signed an order approving the country’s National Security Strategy for the period to 2020. The Carnegie Moscow Center’s Alexei Arbatov commented on the document’s main points in an interview on Vesti television channel ...
North Korea's Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared its decision to recommence activities in its Yongbyon Research Center and resume work on the country's nuclear program ...
The seminar held at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington on April 10 was dedicated to discussing the new possibilities for cooperation between Russia and the U ...
This collective volume was produced as part of the Carnegie Moscow Center's Nonproliferation Project and focuses on the important and complex processes that have intruded on nuclear nonproliferation and that are having an increasing impact on prospects for ending the escalation of the nuclear arms race. Issues explored include the development of nuclear energy, the proliferation of nuclear and conventional weapons delivery systems, and the development of strategic systems. The book also proposes recommendations for the parties involved. The volume is aimed at specialists in international relations and security, nuclear nonproliferation, modern weapons systems and other fields, as well as at the broader public.
Enormous societal and political shifts 20 years ago opened prospects to a new, united Europe and put an end to the Cold War and the nuclear standoff. Despite Russia’s enormous role in this peaceful break from totalitarianism, the country’ course in the subsequent two decades was not so straightforward. The soon-to-be-published book project focuses on the results of Russia’s and other post-communist nations’ transformations, comparing Russia’s experience with that of the Eastern European states. The book’s authors, who include leading Carnegie Moscow Center experts, pose the question: what was the reason behind Russia’s stalled reforms? They lay out the argument that a policy that leads to dismantling of civil liberties in the country and uses strong-arm tactics externally has no prospects. The demolition of the Berlin Wall is no guarantee of success, but democratic transformations are a necessary precondition for the country’s modernization and an authoritative foreign policy of a modern state, as well as its citizens’ well-being. The Carnegie Moscow Center’s website has published the first articles of the soon-to-be-published collection.
The broad use of space and the development of space-based and space-targeted weapons raises the prospect of space as a theater of war. A new book edited by Alexei Arbatov and Vladimir Dvorkin “Outer Space: Weapons, Diplomacy, Security” presents an in-depth analysis of the military, political, technical and legal issues involved in preventing weaponization of space. The collective volume, published by the Carnegie Moscow Center and ROSSPEN, was prepared by Russian researchers under the aegis of the Carnegie Moscow Center's Nonproliferation program. The book is intended both for specialists, as well as a wide range of readers interested in the military- and space-related issues.
Russian–American Security Relations After Georgia Rose Gottemoeller explains that established and well-understood treaties and agreements, which have previously inspired at least predictability and confidence in the bilateral relationship, could help establish a new book of rules both countries can embrace. The author gives the recommendations for Russian and U.S. leaders: to prevent the START Treaty from being swept away in the aftermath of the Georgia crisis; to begin reengagement with the Russians towards a new system of security in Europe on basis of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty; to convene a commission of past presidents – U.S. and Russian – to resolve how to weave Russia and its security interests into the full fabric of European security.
Vol.10, issue 3, June, 2008
Russia and the United States – Time to End the Strategic Deadlock Alexei Arbatov, a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, co-chair of the Nonproliferation program at the Carnegie Moscow Center and head of the Center for International Security at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences, analyses international treaty issues involving strategic weapons in his briefing, “Russia and the United States – Time to End the Strategic Deadlock.” Arbatov examines the source of the current “disarmament vacuum” and offers ways out of the strategic deadlock.